Home

PostHeaderIcon About the Firm

Donahue, Blakemore & Mackey
Donahue Blakemore & Mackey is an "AV" rated, civil trial firm, focused on defending claims for personal liability (automobile and homeowners), commercial general liability (including transportation and products liability), professional liability (legal, medical, dental and veterinarian), construction defect litigation, insurance coverage and bad faith claims.

With those areas of emphasis, James E. Donahue, in 1975, founded the firm of Donahue & Callaham, which has since evolved to become Donahue Blakemore & Mackey. Mr. Donahue remains active as a litigator and mentor, and his claims philosophy is reflected in the attitude and approach taken by all of the firm's attorneys in handling litigation.

The firm's philosophy recognizes that the handling of any given case often has effects far beyond the resolution of that individual case, for both the client and the firm. Our experience has shown that the best results are obtained where the firm has developed the reputation that it's settlement offers are the result of defense counsel's "homework", not "guesswork", and that unaccepted offers result in trial, rather than increased offers.

As practiced by the individual members of this firm, that means the initial steps undertaken are to conduct only the investigation and discovery needed to make a realistic and reliable evaluation of the liability and damages. Using that information, recommendations are made for possible settlement through negotiation or further litigation. However, where the value of a case has been offered, additional authority or offers are not pursued absent an appreciable change in the liability or damages picture. Proximity to trial alone, does not justify an increased offer. Where trial is required, the firm stands prepared to fully commit the time, resources and energy required to obtain the best possible result.

Donahue Blakemore & Mackey believes that their clients have the right to know, upfront, what the anticipated fees and costs on any given case are likely to be through the completion of discovery, arbitration and trial. Toward that end, any attorney handling a file, is expected to provide an estimate of the fees and costs through each of those stages with their initial analysis and to thereafter keep the client informed of significant developments bearing on both liability and damages.
 

PostHeaderIcon Summary Judgment Granted In Premises Liability Action

This premises liability/personal-injury action arises from a trip and fall. While walking his dog at night, Plaintiff followed his dog off the sidewalk into grassy area, where he encountered an unsecured hole and fell. Plaintiff claimed various injuries including serious knee and back injuries potentially requiring surgery, and a blow to the head with a loss of consciousness, with resulting claims of closed skull injuries and cognitive deficits.

Plaintiff sued the homeowners association, the property management company and one of the largest landscape maintenance companies in California. The firm represented the landscape maintenance company. At plaintiff’s deposition, one of the firm’s attorneys obtained admissions from plaintiff that he had no evidence as to how the hole was created or how long the hole existed before he encountered it.

Read more...

 

PostHeaderIcon Indemnity Claims Dismissed In Wrongful Death Action

This wrongful death/personal-injury action arose out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on northbound Interstate 5 near Los Banos, in Merced County, California. At that time and place, a woman was driving a vehicle which she had rented from a car-rental company. The driver had six passengers with her in the vehicle, one of whom was her teenage daughter.

For reasons unknown, a tractor-trailer traveling in the same direction entered the rental car ’s lane of travel as the rental car was passing the big rig, causing the driver of the rental car to swerve and lose control. The rental car went off the left side of the roadway and rolled over multiple times. At the time of the accident, the driver’s teenage daughter was riding in the back seat, and in order to more comfortably sleep, had placed the shoulder strap of her seat belt behind her, leaving the lap belt in its proper placement. When the rental car rolled over, this teenage girl was partially ejected, and was mortally injured. She was later pronounced dead at the scene of the accident. The other six occupants of the rental vehicle were transported to nearby hospitals, but because they were properly wearing their passenger restraint devices, they did not suffer life-threatening injuries.

Read more...

 
Saturday
February 4th, 2012
(916) 648-7444